Momand

Rohullah Allahyar v. Damom Momand

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20252:25-cv-01617California1,048 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROHULLAH ALLAHYAR, Case No. 2:25-cv-01617-TLN-CSK PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DAMOM MOMAND, (ECF No. 4) Defendant. 16 On August 18, 2025, the Court issued a minute order informing Plaintiff Rohullah Allahyar that the affidavit supporting his motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) was incomplete and did not contain all the information needed for the Court to determine whether the motion should be granted.1 (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was ordered to file a complete affidavit responding to all questions as outlined in the August 18, 2025 minute order, within twenty-one (21) days. Id. Over twenty-one (21) days passed, and Plaintiff did not file the required affidavit. See Docket. On November 7, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a complete affidavit supporting his motion to proceed IFP within fourteen (14) days. 11/7/2025 Minute Order. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.