Brown

Joseph Mark Angeja v. Joy LaJuan Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20252:25-cv-03596California956 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH MARK ANGEJA, No. 2:25-cv-03596-DAD-CSK (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUA SPONTE REMANDING CASE

TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR

JOY LAJUAN BROWN, COURT AND DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

Defendant. MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AS MOOT

16 (Doc. Nos. 2, 3)

18 This is an unlawful detainer action brough under California state law by plaintiff Joseph Mark Angeja. On December 12, 2025, defendant Joy LaJuan Brown, proceeding pro se, removed the action to this federal court from the Sacramento County Superior Court and filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion for a temporary restraining order. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2, 3.) A district court has “a duty to establish subject matter jurisdiction over the removed action sua sponte, whether the parties raised the issue or not.” United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed, Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 967 (9th Cir. 2004). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.