Gabriel Curiel-Santana v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202518-72364California661 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABRIEL CURIEL-SANTANA, AKA No. 18-72364 Gabriel Curiel, AKA Alfredo Santana- Cortez, AKA Manuel Santana-Cortez, Agency No. A077-189-929

Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 16, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Gabriel Curiel-Santana, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an

immigration judge’s denial of his application for withholding of removal and relief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1252 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.