Gabriel Curiel-Santana v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202518-72364California661 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GABRIEL CURIEL-SANTANA, AKA No. 18-72364 Gabriel Curiel, AKA Alfredo Santana- Cortez, AKA Manuel Santana-Cortez, Agency No. A077-189-929
Petitioner,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 16, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, BENNETT, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Gabriel Curiel-Santana, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an
immigration judge’s denial of his application for withholding of removal and relief
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under