Lankford

Lankford v. Miller

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202524-6116California1,116 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 16 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH MILLER LANKFORD, No. 24-6116

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01118-JE v.

JAMIE MILLER, Superintendent,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Amy M. Baggio, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 2, 2025 Portland, Oregon

Before: McKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges and FITZWATER, District Judge.**

Petitioner-Appellant Joseph Lankford (“Lankford”), convicted in Oregon circuit

court of murder with a firearm, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a

writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, alleging that his trial counsel’s

ineffective assistance deprived him of his right to counsel under the Sixth

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Amendment, as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.