Bondi

Cuellar Barreto v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202524-5235California788 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 16 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARWIN CAMILO CUELLAR No. 24-5235 BARRETO; JACOBO CUELLAR Agency Nos.

ALVAREZ; IVANIA NIYERETH A246-826-737

ALVAREZ ESCOBAR,

A246-836-752

A246-836-792

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 20, 2025** Submission Deferred October 24, 2025 Submitted December 16, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, BEA, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Petitioners Darwin Camilo Cuellar Barreto, Ivania Niyereth Alavarez

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Escobar, and their minor son (collectively, Petitioners) are natives and citizens of

Colombia and petition for review of the Board of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.