Bondi

Caceres-De Pineda v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202524-7470California1,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVELYN PATRICIA CACERES-DE No. 24-7470 PINEDA; A. S. P.-C., Agency Nos.

A215-651-755

Petitioners, A215-651-757 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 9, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Evelyn Caceres-De Pineda is a native and citizen of El Salvador.

She appeals an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the

decision of an immigration judge (IJ) denying her and her minor child’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). See 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.