Bondi

Banderas Duarte v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 16, 202525-120California1,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 16 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VALERIA BANDERAS DUARTE; E. M. No. 25-120 B.; B. V. B. D., Agency Nos.

A209-390-539

Petitioners, A209-390-540

A209-390-541

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 11, 2025 ** San Francisco, California

Before: BUMATAY, JOHNSTONE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge BUMATAY.

Valeria Banderas Duarte, a native and citizen of Mexico, and her children as

derivative asylum applicants, petition for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal of the immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). order denying Banderas Duarte’s applications…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.