Pontes

Pontes v. Intelliloan CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2025G064585California2,913 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gooding, J.

Filed 12/16/25 Pontes v. Intelliloan CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CHAZ PONTES,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G064585

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2021- 01191704)

INTELLILOAN, INC,

OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, David A. Hoffer, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Cummins & White, Erick J. Becker and Hwui Lee for Defendant and Appellant. Robinson Employment Law, Michael C. Robinson and Lakesha L. Robinson for Plaintiff and Respondent. Plaintiff Chaz Pontes filed a motion asking the trial court to vacate its earlier order compelling his claims to arbitration, arguing defendant Intelliloan, Inc. (Intelliloan) had failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.