Mendoza

Mendoza v. Khan CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2025D085587California2,303 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 12/16/25 Mendoza v. Khan CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MELISSA ROXANNE MENDOZA, D085587

Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 24FDV04537E)

ATIF ALI KHAN,

Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Matthew Brower, Judge. Affirmed. Melissa Roxanne Mendoza, in pro. per., for Appellant. Atif Ali Khan, in pro. per.; and Law Offices of Christopher E. Chaney and Christopher E. Chaney for Respondent. The trial court issued a temporary domestic violence restraining order protecting Melissa Roxanne Mendoza against Atif Ali Khan, her former romantic partner, but later denied her request for a permanent DVRO. Mendoza—a self-represented litigant—appeals, contending…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.