Grayton

Grayton v. Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2025D084527California1,848 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 12/16/25 Grayton v. Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MAURICE GRAYTON, D084527

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022- 00048669-CU-CR-CTL)

METROPOLITAN AREA ADVISORY

COMMITTEE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert C. Longstreth, Judge. Affirmed. Deferred portion of motion to augment granted. Maurice Grayton, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Brockman Quayle Bennett, Robert H. Quayle IV, and Rachel B. Kushner, for Defendants and Respondents. Maurice Grayton appeals the judgment dismissing his lawsuit after the trial court sustained without leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.