Chazanas

Chazanas v. Hakopian CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 2025B339179California3,419 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hanasono, J.

Filed 12/16/25 Chazanas v. Hakopian CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ARI CHAZANAS et al., B339179

Plaintiffs, Cross-Defendants, (Los Angeles County and Respondents. Super. Ct. No. 21STCV22304)

v.

VAZGEN HAKOPIAN,

Defendant, Cross-Complainant, and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael P. Linfield, Judge. Affirmed. Vazgen Hakopian, in pro. per., for Defendant, Cross- Complainant, and Appellant. AXS Law Group LA, James K. Kawahito, and Brian R. Tinkham, for Plaintiffs, Cross-Defendants, and Respondents.

‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Defendant and cross-complainant Vazgen Hakopian1 appeals from a trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.