Shah
Nimesh Shah v. Collette S. Peters, BOP Director, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NIMESH SHAH, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00801-RBM-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
v. BRIEFING FOLLOWING REMAND
COLLETTE S. PETERS, BOP Director, [Docs. 21–22] et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 18 On December 1, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a Dispositive Order and Mandate granting Respondents’ Motion to Vacate and Remand. (Docs. 21–22.) The Dispositive Order vacated this Court’s “order and Judgment denying [Petitioner Nimesh Shah’s] 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, and remand[ed] for further proceedings.” (Doc. 21.) The court “express[ed] no opinion as to the parties’ dispute regarding the effect, if any, of [Petitioner’s] plea agreement on his requested relief, or as to the amount, if any, of unused time credits [he] may have remaining.” (Id.1) 26 27 1 In moving to remand, Respondents argued that these two issues could be determined by 28 To address these remaining issues on…