Paul Klein v. Brian Williams

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202522-16996California581 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL SCOTT KLEIN, No. 22-16996

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00300-MMD-CLB v.

BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden; J. NASH; V. MEMORANDUM*

AUSTIN; M. MINEV; HUBBARD-

PICKETT; P. DELPORTO; LEAVITT;

PALMER; B. ESTILL; JAMES

DZURENDA; ENNIS; MARR, Dr.; JOHNS, Dr.; GEDNEY, Dr.; I. BACA; WALSH; J. MOYLE; BRYAN, Dr.; GARCIA; GALLO;

HANKERD,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 12, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BUMATAY, JOHNSTONE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Paul Klein appeals from the district court’s order adopting of the

magistrate’s Report and Recommendation granting summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.