Bondi

Gonzalez Nepamuseno v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202522-1167California888 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2025

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

GREGORIO GONZALEZ NEPAMUSENO, No. 22-1167 Petitioner, Agency No. A203-714-587 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 20, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: HAWKINS, HURWITZ, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges. Gregorio Gonzalez Nepamuseno, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an order of an

Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying his application for cancellation of removal. We

have jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We deny the petition.

In upholding the denial of cancellation of removal, the BIA held that

Gonzalez Nepamuseno “did not establish that his five United States citizen

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.