Friedman
Friedman v. City of Fairfax
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202524-5861California993 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JACOB FRIEDMAN, No. 24-5861 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:24-cv-00371-DMR v.
MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF FAIRFAX, a general law city,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
FAIRFAX DEPARTMENT OF
PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES,
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
TOWN OF FAIRFAX, MARK LOCKABY,
LINDA NEAL,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 3, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. District Judge.**
Appellant Jacob Friedman (Friedman) appeals the district court’s dismissal
of his complaint against the Town of Fairfax, California (named as City of
Fairfax), two Town agencies, and two Town officials. We review de novo a
dismissal for failure to state a claim.…