Friedman

Friedman v. City of Fairfax

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202524-5861California993 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACOB FRIEDMAN, No. 24-5861 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:24-cv-00371-DMR v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF FAIRFAX, a general law city,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

FAIRFAX DEPARTMENT OF

PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES,

PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE

TOWN OF FAIRFAX, MARK LOCKABY,

LINDA NEAL,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Donna M. Ryu, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 3, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. District Judge.**

Appellant Jacob Friedman (Friedman) appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his complaint against the Town of Fairfax, California (named as City of

Fairfax), two Town agencies, and two Town officials. We review de novo a

dismissal for failure to state a claim.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.