Cardenas

Cardenas v. City of Santa Maria

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202524-5457California2,035 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADOLFO CARDENAS, individually, No. 24-5457 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-10146-MRW v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF SANTA MARIA; ANDY

BRICE; DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael R. Wilner, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 9, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and KOH, Circuit Judges, and CHEN, District Judge.** Partial Concurrence by Judge KOH.

Adolfo Cardenas appeals the district court’s grant of Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de

novo, Anthoine v. N. Cent. Counties Consortium, 605 F.3d 740, 747 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.