Barbanell

Barbanell v. Lodge CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 2025D084193California3,760 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kelety, J.

Filed 12/17/25 Barbanell v. Lodge CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTA V. BARBANELL, as Trustee, D084193 etc. et al., (Super. Ct. No. 37-2023- Respondents, 00022902-CU-PT-NC)

v.

RAYMOND E. LODGE et al.,

Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl H. Maas III, Judge. Affirmed. Plante Huguenin Lebovic Kahn, Edward R. Huguenin and James L. Bothwell for Appellants. Klinedinst PC, Carey L. Cooper and Theodore S. Wolter for Respondents. Appellants, Raymond E. Lodge and Condor’s Nest, LLC (collectively, Lodge), challenge the superior court’s postjudgment award of attorney fees to respondents, Roberta V. Barbanell, El Rancho De Vida, El Rancho De Vida Three, LLC, and El…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.