Peterson

Peterson v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202525-528California1,188 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEXANDRA D. PETERSON, No. 25-528

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:24-cv-03106-TOR v. * FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of MEMORANDUM Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 19, 2025 Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, W. FLETCHER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Alexandra Peterson (“Peterson”) appeals the district court’s order affirming

an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for Social

Security disability insurance benefits.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review the district

court’s order affirming the denial of benefits de novo. Kitchen v. Kijakazi,

F.4th 732, 735, 738 (9th Cir. 2023). We “will disturb the denial of benefits only if

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.