Cruz-Quintanilla

Cruz-Quintanilla v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 202525-1046California1,112 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 17 2025

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MILAGRO MABEL CRUZ- No. 25-1046 QUINTANILLA and A. M. J.-C., Agency No. A209-993-666 Petitioners, A209-993-667 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 1, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: R. NELSON, COLLINS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Milagro Mabel Cruz-Quintanilla and her minor daughter, who

are both citizens of El Salvador, timely petition for review of a decision by the

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) upholding an order of an Immigration

Judge (“IJ”) denying Cruz-Quintanilla’s application for asylum and withholding of

removal.1 We have jurisdiction under § 242 of the Immigration and Nationality

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes that this case is suitable for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.