Mendia-Alcaraz

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bernardo Mendia-Alcaraz, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20253:24-cv-05823California5,988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE

COMMISSION, Case No. 24-cv-05823-RS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT

BERNARDO MENDIA-ALCARAZ, et al., Defendants.

15 INTRODUCTION This is a civil securities enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“the SEC”) against defendants Bernardo Mendia-Alcaraz and Toltec Capital LLC (collectively, “defendants”) and Relief Defendants Edith F. Ramirez Cano and Fondo Toltec S de RL de CV (collectively, “relief defendants”). The complaint alleges defendants engaged in securities fraud, made unregistered securities offerings, and deceived investors through materially false and misleading statements in violation of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act’), and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”). The SEC seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.