Berry

Sean M. Berry and Patricia Berry v. Zachary Petri, et. al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20253:25-cv-02367California2,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN M. BERRY and PATRICIA Case No. 25-cv-02367-BAS-DEB

BERRY,

ORDER:

Plaintiffs, (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA

ZACHARY PETRI, et. al, PAUPERIS (ECF No. 4)

Defendants. (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT (ECF No. 1)

Plaintiffs Sean M. Berry and Patricia Berry (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se— without an attorney. Plaintiffs filed a complaint on September 8, 2025, against Defendants Zachary Petri, Angel Manzano, and Chula Vista Police Department (“Defendants”). (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs seek to relief for the impoundment of their motor home by the Chula Vista Police Department and its officers. (Id.) Plaintiffs have also filed a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”)—without prepaying court fees or costs. (ECF No. 4.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.