In re: Broiler Chicken Grower Antitrust Litigation (No. IID)

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20253:25-cv-07996California982 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

| hereby certify that the annexed is a true and ca copy ofa document or an electronic docket enti file at the United States District Court for the Dis of Utah. Dig, UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL pene eenaae= oy (i @ on Gary Se □□ MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION By / \ Deputy gler □□□ tS

IN RE: BROILER CHICKEN GROWER

ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. IID) MDL No. 3167

TRANSFER ORDER

Before the Panel:* Plaintiffs move under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in the District of Utah. This litigation consists of five actions pending in five districts, as listed on Schedule A. The parties have notified the Panel of a related action pending in the District of Delaware.'! Responding defendants’ suggest centralization in the Western District of Arkansas or, alternatively, the Northern District of Illinois. In their reply, plaintiffs agree that the Northern District of Illinois would be a suitable alternative transferee district. The Panel previously granted centralization of substantially similar actions brought by plaintiffs against different…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.