Malloy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STEPHEN MALLOY, Case No. 25-cv-09885-LJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 2 CONSTELLIS-TRIPLE CANOPY, Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Stephan Malloy, pro se, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). ECF No. 2. The primary effects of such an application being granted would be to excuse Plaintiff from paying the $405 filing fee for this civil action and that an agent of the Court (typically the U.S. Marshal) would complete service of process on Plaintiff’s behalf, if the Court determines that Plaintiff’s Complaint is not subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff’s IFP application states that his monthly income is $7,200, that he has $500 in cash or in a checking or savings account, and that he has $9,000 in a certificate of deposit. Id. at 1-2. He states that his “Housing and Expenses are equal to [his] disability of $7,200” and that he makes monthly $500 payments towards a credit card loan, and attached a copy of an…