Souvannaseng
AMKHA SOUVANNASENG v. KRISTI NOEM, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMKHA SOUVANNASENG, Case No.: 3:25-cv-3473-CAB-DEB
Petitioner,
ORDER:
v. (1) GRANTING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [Doc. KRISTI NOEM, et al., No. 1] Respondents. (2) DENYING MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AS MOOT [Doc. No. 2]
19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Amkha Souvannaseng’s (“Petitioner”) Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, [Doc. No. 1 (“Petition”)], and Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, [Doc. No. 2 (“TRO”)]. Respondents filed a response that simultaneously addressed the Petition and the TRO. [Doc. No. 6.] The Court finds Petitioner’s motions suitable for determination on the papers. See CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the following reasons, the Petition is GRANTED, and Petitioner’s TRO is DENIED AS MOOT. 28 I. BACKGROUND Petitioner is a native of Laos who came to the United States in 1979. [Petition at 20.] Petitioner’s…