Perez

Rubisel Aguilar Perez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20253:25-cv-03522California262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBISEL AGUILAR PEREZ, Case No.: 3:25-cv-3522-CAB-MMP

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

v. FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

ENFORCEMENT,

15 Respondent.

17 Before the Court is Rubisel Aguilar Perez’s petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [Doc. No. 1.] Having reviewed Mr. Perez’s petition, the 19 Court finds it deficient because the proper respondent is the warden of Otay Mesa Regional 20 Detention Center. Habeas petitioners “challenging their present physical confinement 21 [must] name their immediate custodian, the warden of the facility where they are detained, 22 as the respondent to their petition.” Doe v. Garland, 109 F.4th 1188, 1197 (9th Cir. 2024). 23 The Court cannot exercise jurisdiction over Mr. Perez’s petition so long as he fails to name 24 as respondent the warden of the detention facility where he is being detained. 25 Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Mr. Perez’s petition with leave to amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.