Cesario Medina v. Pitchess Detention Center South Facility

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 18, 202523-55109California1,038 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESARIO VIZCARRA MEDINA, No. 23-55109 D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 2:19-cv-02921-JAK-ADS v.

MEMORANDUM*

PITCHESS DETENTION CENTER

SOUTH FACILITY; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 2, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, OWENS, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Cesario Vizcarra Medina (“Medina”) appeals the district

court’s order granting Defendant-Appellee Nurse Nancy Yamasaki’s (“Nurse

Yamasaki”) motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Medina’s claim that Nurse

Yamasaki was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs based on his pretrial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. status as a sex offender.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district

court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.