Bondi

Silva Hernandez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 18, 202525-634California1,199 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME SILVA HERNANDEZ; MARIA No. 25-634 CONCEPCION GOMEZ MIRANDA, Agency Nos.

A205-263-335

Petitioners, A205-263-336 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 11, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Jaime Silva-Hernandez and Maria Concepcion Gomez-Miranda

seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) summary affirmance of the

immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, protection under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and cancellation of removal. We deny the

petition.

When “the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.