Bondi
Silva Hernandez v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 18, 202525-634California1,199 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAIME SILVA HERNANDEZ; MARIA No. 25-634 CONCEPCION GOMEZ MIRANDA, Agency Nos.
A205-263-335
Petitioners, A205-263-336 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 11, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Jaime Silva-Hernandez and Maria Concepcion Gomez-Miranda
seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) summary affirmance of the
immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, protection under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and cancellation of removal. We deny the
petition.