In re: Barrie William George Eves

Good Law
United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 202525-20483California1,578 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION POSTED TO THE WEBSITE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7 In re: Case No. 25-20483-A-7

BARRIE WILLIAM GEORGE EVES, KA-

9 Memorandum Amending Findings of Debtor. Fact and Conclusions of Law 11

15 Argued and submitted on December 15, 2025 17 at Sacramento, California 18 Honorable Fredrick E. Clement, Bankruptcy Judge Presiding

20 Attorney Kimberly Ahrens for Creditors Maurice Giron, Appearances: Ahrens Law, APC, and Kimberly Ahrens; Attorney James A. Shepherd for the Debtor

23 24 25 26 27 Section 362(d)(1) allows this court to modify the stay to allow state court litigation to liquidate a debt. Creditor prevailed against the debtor in state court but has not ruled on an attorneys’ fees motion. Debtor filed Chapter 7, which is a “no asset” case. Creditor sections 523, 727 actions. The debt will only be relevant if the plaintiff prevails in the adversary proceeding but requires continued state court litigation. Should the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.