Samim Chowdhury v. Joseph Edlow et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20258:25-cv-02076California517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 8:25-cv-02076-FWS-ADS Date December 15, 2025 Title Samim Chowdhury v. Joseph Edlow et al

Present: The Honorable FRED W. SLAUGHTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Rolls Royce Paschal Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR

LACK OF PROSECUTION

is the plaintiffs responsibility to move a case toward a merits disposition.” Thomas v. Kernan, 2019 WL 8888200, at * (C.D. Cal. July 10, 2019) (citing Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 942 F.2d 648, 652 (9th Cir. 1991)). That includes timely serving the complaint and filing a proof of Absent a showing of good cause, “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court... must dismiss the action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Here, 90 days have passed since Plaintiff filed the Complaint, yet no proof of service has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.