Chestnut
Sanjiv Kakkar v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SANJIV KAKKAR, Case No. 1:25-cv-01627-JLT-SAB-HC
Petitioner, ORDER REQUIRING CHRISTINE
RAYMOND TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PRO
v. HAC VICE APPLICATION SHOULD NOT
BE DENIED
CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., (ECF No. 9) Respondents.
16 The Court has read and considered the application of Christine Raymond, attorney for Petitioner, for admission to practice pro hac vice under the provisions of Rule 180(b)(2) of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for this District (“Local Rules” or “L.R.”). (ECF No. 9.) Local Rule 180 provides in pertinent part: Attorneys Pro Hac Vice. An attorney who is a member in good standing of, and eligible to practice before, the Bar of any United States Court or of the highest Court of any State, or of any Territory or Insular Possession of the United States, and who has been retained to appear in this Court may, upon application and in the discretion of the Court, be permitted to appear and participate…