Chestnut

Sanjiv Kakkar v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20251:25-cv-01627California597 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANJIV KAKKAR, Case No. 1:25-cv-01627-JLT-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER REQUIRING CHRISTINE

RAYMOND TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PRO

v. HAC VICE APPLICATION SHOULD NOT

BE DENIED

CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., (ECF No. 9) Respondents.

16 The Court has read and considered the application of Christine Raymond, attorney for Petitioner, for admission to practice pro hac vice under the provisions of Rule 180(b)(2) of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for this District (“Local Rules” or “L.R.”). (ECF No. 9.) Local Rule 180 provides in pertinent part: Attorneys Pro Hac Vice. An attorney who is a member in good standing of, and eligible to practice before, the Bar of any United States Court or of the highest Court of any State, or of any Territory or Insular Possession of the United States, and who has been retained to appear in this Court may, upon application and in the discretion of the Court, be permitted to appear and participate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.