Vado C.G. v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VADO C.G., No. 1:25-cv-01858-TLN-CSK Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY et al., 14 Respondents.

16 Petitioner Vado C.G.1 (“Petitioner”), an immigration detainee who is representing himself 17 filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Based on the substance 18 of Petitioner’s brief and the relief requested therein, the Court construes Petitioner’s pleading as a 19 motion for a temporary restraining order. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976) (stating 20 that pleadings by pro se litigants must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings 21 drafted by lawyers). 22 Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner’s request for injunctive relief by Noon on 23 December 19, 2025. Any opposition shall provide the Court with copies of all 24 As requested by Petitioner (ECF No. 1 at 2 n.1) and recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial…