Prem S. v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PREM S., No. 1:25-cv-01869-TLN-SCR Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY et al., 14 Respondents.
16 Petitioner Prem S.1 (“Petitioner”), an immigration detainee who is representing himself, 17 filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (ECF No. 1.) Based on 18 the substance of Petitioner’s brief and the relief requested therein, the Court construes Petitioner’s 19 pleading as a motion for a temporary restraining order. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 20 (1976) (stating that pleadings by pro se litigants must be held to less stringent standards than 21 formal pleadings drafted by lawyers). 22 Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner’s request for injunctive relief by noon on 23 24 As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits petitioner’s full name, using only his first name and last initial,…