Willis

Willis v. City of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202524-3154California844 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BYRON WILLIS, No. 24-3154 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:21-cv-01077-CDB v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF BAKERSFIELD; SANTOS

LUEVANO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Christopher Dale Baker, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,

District Judge.***

Appellant Byron Willis challenges the district court’s grant of summary

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. judgment on his false arrest/false imprisonment and malicious prosecution claims

in favor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.