Athey Creek Christian Fellowship v. County of Clackamas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202524-5104California814 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ATHEY CREEK CHRISTIAN No. 24-5104 FELLOWSHIP, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01717-YY Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Youlee Yim You, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 23, 2025 Portland, Oregon

Before: W. FLETCHER, CHRISTEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Athey Creek Christian Fellowship appeals a summary judgment in favor of

the County of Clackamas. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and

reviewing de novo, Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San Diego, 670 F.3d

957, 970 (9th Cir. 2011), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. The statute of limitations for Athey Creek’s Religious Land Use and

Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) claims is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.