Bondi

Romero Romero v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202525-284California1,997 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NECTALI ULISES ROMERO ROMERO, No. 25-284 Agency No. Petitioner, A092-707-146 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 17, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: BOGGS, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.** Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge MENDOZA.

Nectali Ulises Romero Romero (“Romero”), a citizen of El Salvador and

former lawful permanent resident, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order

denying his application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. (CAT). He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.