Media Matters for America v. X Corp.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 202525-2463California1,495 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA; No. 25-2463 ANGELO CARUSONE; ERIC D.C. No. HANANOKI, 3:25-cv-02397-VC Plaintiffs - Appellees,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

X CORP.; TWITTER INTERNATIONAL

UNLIMITED COMPANY; TWITTER

ASIA PACIFIC PTE, LTD.,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 17, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: BOGGS, BRESS, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.**

Media Matters published an article claiming that X Corp.’s (“X”) content

moderation policies permitted the placement of “pro-Nazi” content next to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. advertisements for major brands.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.