People v. Stout CA4/1

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to independently review the record for error. To assist the court in its review, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 counsel has identified a possible issue that was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Whether the trial court erred in denying Stout’s motion and whether the denial affected Stout’s substantial rights. We have independently reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Stout on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The order denying Stout’s motion for dismissal of enhancements and request for resentencing is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

CASTILLO, Acting P. J.

RUBIN, J.

 Retired Associate Justice of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. 3