Negrete

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AKIVA ISRAEL, No. 2:22-cv-1391 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

ORDER

ROBERT NEGRETE, Defendant. 15 Plaintiff appears pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 12, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion to modify the scheduling order, including the discovery deadline. (ECF No. 52). Defendant does not oppose the modification. (ECF No. 53.) As discussed below, the motion to modify the scheduling order is granted. I. GOVERNING STANDARDS “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably…