Chandra

Ruben Dario Garcia, Jr. v. A. Chandra, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20252:22-cv-01221California1,147 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN DARIO GARCIA, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. 2:22-cv-01221-TLN-CSK v. A. CHANDRA, et al., ORDER Defendants.

16 17 This matter is before the Court on pro se Plaintiff Ruben Dario Garcia, Jr.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Reconsideration of the assigned magistrate judge’s September 12, 2025 order. (ECF No. 70.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The general facts of this case are known to both parties. Relevant here, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel Defendant J. Quiring (“Quiring”) to provide a further response to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents, Set Two (“RPD”) No. 4. (ECF No. 53). In response to Plaintiff’s RPD No. 4, Quiring objected and stated if a responsive document could be found, it would be promptly produced and if it could not be located, Quiring would amend his response accordingly. (ECF No. 55 at 2.) In ruling on Plaintiff’s motion,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.