Davis

Alexandre Zdenek Davis v. Unknown Superintendent, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20253:25-cv-02723California797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDRE ZDENEK DAVIS, Case No.: 25cv2723-DMS (LR) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

vs. RECONSIDERATION 14 UNKNOWN SUPERINTENDENT, et al., Defendants. 17 18 On October 3, 2025, Alexandre Zdenek Davis, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) but instead filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (ECF No. 2.) On November 19, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiff’s IFP motion on the basis that he could afford to pay the $405 civil filing fee because his prison certificate showed an average monthly balance of $1825.77 and average monthly deposits of $766.67 for the six months preceding the filing of this action, and an available balance of $645.28. (ECF No. 3 at 2.) This action was dismissed for failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.