Orlando Alfredo Gimenez Gil v. Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20253:25-cv-03279California2,526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORLANDO ALFREDO GIMENEZ GIL, Case No.: 3:25-cv-03279-DMS-VET

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

WARDEN, OTAY MESA DETENTION CENTER, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 18 (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1). Respondents filed a return to the Petition. (Return, ECF 19 No. 5). Petitioner, proceeding pro se, did not file a reply. After reviewing the initial briefs, 20 the Court issued an Order requiring supplemental briefing to address the following issues: 21 (1) whether Petitioner’s parole was revoked prior to the dismissal of his removal 22 proceedings on June 24, 2025; (2) whether the dismissal of Petitioner’s removal 23 proceedings and initiation of expedited removal proceedings without parole or an 24 opportunity to be heard violates Petitioner’s due process rights under Mathews v. Eldridge, 25 424 U.S. 319 (1976);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.