Holmes

Juan Carlos Calderon v. B. Holmes, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20252:25-cv-01446California535 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON,

Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-01446-TLN-JDP

13 v. ORDER

B. HOLMES, et al.,

15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Juan Carlos Calderon’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion 18 for Reconsideration in this closed civil rights action. (ECF No. 17.) For the reasons set forth 19 below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. 20 Plaintiff filed this civil rights action on May 19, 2025, (ECF No. 1), along with an 21 application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2). The assigned magistrate judge 22 subsequently made findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s application to proceed in 23 forma pauperis because Plaintiff was a three-strikes litigant within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.§ 24 1915(g). (ECF No. 6.) On August 8, 2025, this Court adopted these findings and 25 recommendations and directed Plaintiff to tender the filing fee within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 26 8.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee or file any objections. As such, on September 29, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.