Jonathan Ramone Franklin v. Jose Esquetini, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20252:24-cv-06528California844 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-06528-FWS-AJR Date: December 17, 2025 Page 1 of

Title: Jonathan Ramone Franklin v. Jose Esquetini, et al.

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

BECAUSE PLAINTIFF HAS NOT FILED A FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

PRESENT:

HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_ Claudia Garcia-Marquez_ _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On July 31, 2024, Plaintiff Jonathan Ramone Franklin (“Plaintiff”), a pro se federal prisoner now confined at the Federal Correctional Institution Ray Brook in New York, filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against the following Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) employees who worked at the U.S. Penitentiary in Victorville, California (“USP Victorville”) during the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.