Lopez
Michelle M. Lopez v. Sundt Construction, Inc., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE M. LOPEZ, No. 2:25-cv-02412-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER SUNDT CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Defendant. 16 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 6) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the court vacates the initial scheduling conference set for December 22, 2025 and hereby issues this scheduling order. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS The named defendants Sundt Construction, Inc. and Sundt Construction, Inc. Northern California1 have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. No further service ///// 26 Plaintiff states that she “will in fact dismiss Defendant Sundt Construction, Inc. Northern California…