Lopez

Michelle M. Lopez v. Sundt Construction, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20252:25-cv-02412California2,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE M. LOPEZ, No. 2:25-cv-02412-DAD-AC Plaintiff, v. SCHEDULING ORDER SUNDT CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Defendant. 16 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 6) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the court vacates the initial scheduling conference set for December 22, 2025 and hereby issues this scheduling order. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS The named defendants Sundt Construction, Inc. and Sundt Construction, Inc. Northern California1 have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. No further service ///// 26 Plaintiff states that she “will in fact dismiss Defendant Sundt Construction, Inc. Northern California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.