Muela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JASON LEVETTE WASHINGTON, Case No. 25-cv-03057-JSC

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 17 R. MUELA, Defendant.

12 After screening Mr. Washington’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court dismissed his complaint and granted him until August 7, 2025 to file an amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 11.) Because as of October 3, 2025, Mr. Washington had not filed an amended complaint, the Court entered judgment in favor of R. Muela and against Mr. Washington. (Dkt. No. 14.) Mr. Washington now moves for partial summary adjudication against R. Muela and Ivan Satterfield, (Dkt. No. 15), as well as ex parte emergency injunctive relief and restitution, (Dkt. No. 17). The Court denies these motions because, as it has previously explained, “Mr. Washington has not filed an amended complaint upon which to base his motion[s].” (Dkt. No. 13 at 1.) In addition, because the Court has entered judgment against Mr. Washington, it cannot treat his …