Jacob Lee Reeder v. Trans Union LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20255:25-cv-01194California3,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On May 16, 2025, plaintiff Jacob Lee Reeder (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against defendants Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), Bank of America, N.A., and Does 1-10. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on August 8, 2025. (“FAC,” Dkt. No. 18.) Defendant Trans Union filed an answer to the FAC on August 18, 2025. (Dkt. No. 20.) Subsequently, Defendant Bank of America filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on August 29, 2025. (“First MTD,” Dkt. No. 21.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on September 15, 2025. (Dkt. No. 22.) Defendant filed a reply on September 22, 2025. (Dkt. No. 22.) The Court granted the First MTD on October 10, 2025. (“Order,” Dkt. No. 30.)

On October 24, 2025, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. (“SAC,” Dkt. No. 31.) Plaintiff asserts thirteen causes of action under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”): (1) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681c(f); (2) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b); (3) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681g(a); (4) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681a(1); (5) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(2)(A); (6) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(4); (7) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(5)(A); (8)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.