Laatz

Nicky Laatz, et al. v. Zazzle, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20255:22-cv-04844California1,291 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NICKY LAATZ, et al., Case No. 5:22-cv-04844-BLF

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR POSTING OF A BOND

PURSUANT TO CALIOFNIRA CODE

ZAZZLE, INC., et al., OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1030 Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 489] 12 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for bond pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1030. ECF No. 489 (“Mot.”); see also ECF No. 504 (“Reply”). Plaintiff opposes the motion. See ECF No. 497 (“Opp.”). The matter is suitable for adjudication without oral argument; the hearing set for March 5, 2026, is VACATED. See Civ. L.R. 7-11(b). The motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the facts giving rise to this lawsuit, which need not be repeated in full here. On May 9, 2025, the Court granted-in-part and denied-in-part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.