Collier

Joe Robert Collier v. James Hill, Warden, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20253:25-cv-03487California2,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE ROBERT COLLIER, Case No.: 25-cv-3487-AJB-MMP

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND

DENYING MOTIONS FOR IFP

JAMES HILL, Warden, et al.,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT

Respondents. 16 On October 20, 2025, Petitioner Joe Robert Collier, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a complaint on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights form in the Northern District of California, which was docketed as a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1651. (Doc. No. 1; see also docket in N.D. Cal. Case No. 3:25-cv-08946-LB.)1 On October 20, 2025, Collier also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. No. 2.) After the Clerk provided notice to Collier of both the filing fee for a civil action and that he had not submitted his IFP motion on the proper form (Doc. No. 3), on November 7, 2025, Collier filed a second IFP motion (Doc. No. 6). On November 19,

26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.