Delacruz

Maureece Simpkins v. Armando Delacruz, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20251:25-cv-00249California594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAUREECE SIMPKINS, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00249-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS FOLLOWING SCREENING

OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

ARMANDO DELACRUZ, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

Plaintiff Maureece Simpkins is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. I. BACKGROUND On November 26, 2025, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 11.) It found Plaintiff plausibly alleged the following claims: Eighth Amendment excessive force against Defendants Delacruz and Escobedo; Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendant Policarpio, and Eighth Amendment failure to protect against Defendants Hightower and Moreno-Guillen; the undersigned further found Plaintiff failed to allege any other cognizable claim against any other named Defendant. (Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.