Mancinelli

Brook Mancinelli v. Marriott International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20254:25-cv-08246California422 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BROOK MANCINELLI, Case No. 25-cv-08246-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Re: ECF No. 28 Defendant.

13 Before the Court is Defendant Marriott International, Inc.’s motion for leave to file a 14 surreply to the motion for remand. ECF No. 28. Marriott argues that it needs a surreply to (1) 15 respond to Plaintiff Brook Mancinelli’s evidentiary objections to the opposition and (2) provide 16 additional evidence in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to “moot” those objections. Id. at 2. 17 Marriott also argues that it needs to respond to a new argument in Mancinelli’s reply regarding 18 equitable jurisdiction. Id. at 2. Mancinelli opposes the motion, arguing that Defendant should not 19 be permitted to file now evidence it could have submitted earlier with its opposition, and that 20 Plaintiff made an equitable jurisdiction argument in its reply brief to respond to Marriott’s 21 argument, in its opposition brief, that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.